-
Anonymous, England (before 1695)
I.
Literal Comprehension
Context: This poem is written by an
unknown English poet in the seventeenth century. He has told a story of King
John and the Abbot of Canterbury in this poem.
Feeling threatened by the way of the Abbot’s
house-keeping, King John called him to his palace and asked him three difficult
questions. The abbot would be killed if he couldn’t answer them. The questions
were: How much did king John worth? How
quickly might he travel around the earth? and what did he think?
The abbot couldn’t answer the
questions immediately, so he asked the king for a fortnight’s time. Then, he
went to Cambridge and Oxford universities where he met scholars. But they
couldn’t answer the king’s questions. The abbot returned home when just three
days were left before the king’s deadline. His shepherd knew about his
discomfort. Taking the Abbot’s permission, the shepherd disguised himself as
the abbot and went to the king’s palace. When the king asked him the first
question again, he answered that Jesus Christ was betrayed by one of his
disciples for thirty pence, so the king was worth one penny less. The king
became happy because only Christ was better than him. Answering the second
question, the shepherd said that the king could travel around world in 24 hours
if he started with the sunrise at the same speed. Lastly, he said that the king
thought he was the Abbot of Canterbury, but actually he was the abbot’s
shepherd. Then, he asked for the king’s forgiveness for himself and his master.
The king became so happy that he wanted to place the shepherd in the abbot’s
position, but he denied the offer as he was illiterate. Then, the king offered
him four nobles a week. He also pardoned the shepherd and his master.
II.
Interpretation
This poem might be trying to tell us
that practical knowledge or experience is more important than bookish
knowledge. The abbot goes to Cambridge and Oxford universities to meet the
scholars with the hope that they will suggest him answers for the king’s
puzzle, but they are unable to help him. Finally, his own shepherd who is
illiterate easily solves his problem. So, this poem is an irony to the
bookworms who don’t have any practical knowledge. This poem might also be
trying to tell us that powerful people are always happy with flattery. The
shepherd disguised as the Abbot of Canterbury placed king John just a step
below God and above all the other human beings while answering the question
about his worth. So, the king became happy with him.
III.
Critical Thinking
The story narrated in the form of a
musical poem is very amusing, but is this king of event possible to happen in
the reality? I don’t think it is. Was the king so foolish that he couldn’t
recognize the shepherd and took him as the abbot? Moreover, this poem has tried
to mislead the readers with the idea that ‘a fool may teach a wise man’. If it
is so, why does the shepherd decline at last from the king’s proposal for
making him the Abbot of Canterbury saying that he cannot read and write? It
means literacy or education is always superior to ignorance.
IV.
Assimilation
We mustn’t be bookish and impractical
while trying to be educated. Formal education or university education may be
valuable in a way, but we always need practical mind to deal with everyday
troubles. Therefore, we must never underestimate anybody. Even a person who is
subordinate to us may help us in a time of need.
No comments:
Post a Comment