-
Richard P. Feynman, USA
(1918-1988) with Ralph Leighton
I.
Literal Comprehension
Context:
This essay is written by Richard Phillips Feynman (1918-1988), an American
physicist, who won Nobel Prize in 1965. In this essay, Mr Feynman has revealed
his belief in the practice of interdisciplinarity.
Mr
Feynman did his undergraduate at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
and wanted to do graduation, but his professor advised him to go somewhere else
and find out how the rest of the world was. So, he chose Princeton University
for his graduation. On the very first day, he was invited to the tea party
organized by Dean Eisenhart for the new students. Since he was an informal man,
he felt nervous seeing the high formality at the party. Mrs Eisenhart asked him
what he would like- cream or lemon- in his tea. In his nervousness, he said he
would take both. Mrs Eisenhart laughed at him and guessed that he might be
joking. Mr Feynman knew that he had made a social mistake. In the beginning, he
hated the academic gown that students had to wear to dinner for formality. He
felt easy when he knew he could wear anything under the gown. He saw the
cyclotron at Princeton and immediately appreciated it for its openness. Though
there was a chaotic mess, students could study about the different parts of it.
Mr Feynman was a regular student of Physics, but he did not limit himself only
to his group. He sat with philosophers and listened to them discuss. He learned
a different way of looking at an object called ‘brick’. He also studied
biology. He wrote research papers and attended the seminars. He knew many
things in biology, but felt that he was not fit for the subject. At last, he
returned to his subject, physics.
II.
Interpretation
This
essay might be trying to tell us that students must be knowledge-oriented, not
the exam-oriented. We usually study for high marks in the exams. But Mr Feynman
did not worry about the exam. He was a true seeker of knowledge and
enlightenment. Also, the essay has emphasized upon the importance of
interdisciplinarity. It is always advantageous. Mr Feynman could understand
biology easily because of his knowledge in physics and mathematics. Interdisciplinarity
also helps us enjoy the variety of knowledge.
III.
Critical Thinking
I
agree with the writer that interdisciplinarity is profitable for us. The
knowledge of one discipline helps us in another discipline. But there is always
a danger of being jack of all and master
of none. Specialty in a field of knowledge has its own importance in
today’s world. Also, it is not always possible to practice interdisciplinarity.
The use of scientific jargons has made this text too complicated for a
management student like me.
IV.
Assimilation
This
essay has taught me that we mustn’t be limited to one area or discipline. I am
going to try to enjoy the taste of variety in my life from today onwards. I
will keep my mind open for any kind of knowledge so that it will be helpful to
me in future.
08.12.14
No comments:
Post a Comment